06/13/2020
The choice of whether or not to outsource is common in business, and when it
comes to marketing automation the question often applies. Is it more
advantageous to develop in house competencies, or is it best to team up with an
agency that specializes in the technology? The objective of this post is to share
some of our experience in order to help marketers make an informed decision
when confronted with this issue.
Essentially, the depth of resources required to run a marketing automation
initiative are determined by two considerations – the first being the complexity of
the platform and the second being the depth of use.
As one would expect, not all marketing automation platforms are created equal.
Entry-level platforms are biased towards a broadcast mode of operation. Their
primary job is to deploy marketing messages via email. Moving up the ladder, the
more sophisticated platforms augment email deployment capabilities with
interpretive functions that enable complex database segmentation and deep
integration with Customer Relationship Management (CRM) products.
The second variable to consider is the depth of use, or reliance on the platform.
Is the technology being used in a minimal capacity, say for sending out monthly
emails, or is there a commitment to utilizing the full spectrum of what platform
can deliver? In general, companies that employ the higher-level tools tend to
make proportionately greater use of them, but that's not always the case. Some
marketers really dig into the entry-level products and work hard to get the most
out of them.
Depending on the mix between platform sophistication, and degree of use, the
advantages of outsourcing nets out differently at varying points. The following
chart illustrates the interplay of these two factors.

a). High Platform Sophistication / Lite Use – these scenarios usually involve
larger corporations that are becoming acquainted with a platform, or are not
making extensive use of it. As the learning curve associated with these platforms
is quite steep it makes sense to outsource assistance. If a dedicated in-house
person is not available, an external team can jump on operational tasks and get
things done. The higher-level platforms are also expensive, so from a return-on-
investment point of view it's worthwhile to start utilizing them as quickly as
possible. Additionally, it is useful to have access to a seasoned expert who can
share knowledge with an in-house team and accelerate platform adoption.
b). High Platform Sophistication / Heavy Use – as a vendor of consulting
services, you might have expected me to advocate for consultancy here. It does,
however, take time to become familiar with an evolved and heavily used
marketing automation platform. In these instances, the learning curve favours the
in-house team. It is therefore best to have a full time person, or team, on site to
stay current with the system. Consultants, however, can still be useful in the face
of unfamiliar technical challenges, or to assist with staffing shortages.
c). Medium Platform Sophistication / Lite Use – in situations where the tool is
slated for only Lite use, say for a monthly newsletter deployment, it is reasonable
to appoint an in-house marketing resource to administer the platform. When
demands are moderate, longer learning curves can be accommodated, and more
testing can be afforded to catch mistakes based on operational oversights.
d). Medium Platform Sophistication / Heavy Use – here, breadth of knowledge is
as important its depth. Projects can easily require across-the-board familiarity
with areas such as HTML development, database work, and platform expertise.
It's a challenge for even the sharpest of people to stay on top of the range of
skills required to manage a campaign from end-to-end. A consulting agency,
however, can draw on a variety of staff members and plug in the right person as
required. When you hire a marketing automation agency, you are actually hiring
a diverse number of people, each with highly-developed areas of specialization.
If your digital marketing initiatives are mission critical, it is advantageous to have
a talent pool to draw off of, in contrast to one or two people who may not have
the time to research issues as they come up.
e). Low Platform Sophistication / Lite Use – this is the least demanding of all
scenarios. In general, it is characterized by the need to send out a monthly
product update or newsletter to a list of standing customers. If requirements are
lite, then it makes sense to tap in a consultant who can quickly affect the
necessary deployment without breaking the work rhythm of other employees.
This model is frequent employed by solo entrepreneurs, or companies with small
staff counts who cannot spare the time to step outside of their normal routines.
f). Low Platform Sophistication and Heavy Use – again you might think that I
would favour consulting as an option here, but if the platform is basic and the
demand is heavy, the chances are the work involved will be fairly repetitive. In
such instances, there is seldom a need to onboard a highly skilled consultant. If
the volume of work warrants it, then there is a strong argument to be made for
retaining a staff member dedicated to this flow of work.
Real world considerations can provide a lot of colouring that cannot be
accounted for in the above framework. Additional points of consideration may
take into account the following:
As one would expect, the more sophisticated the platform, the fewer the number
of trained experts who specialize in it. This, in turn, affects wages. A quick survey
of the job website Indeed, revealed that administrator's wages for an enterprise
level platform can be double that of an entry-level marketing automation platform.
Does your organization methodically plan marketing programs in advance, or is
your mode of operation more spontaneous? If your organization's needs are
likely to change or scale up on short notice, then an alliance with a consultant
may help you stay on track with your objectives. Conversely, organizations with
predictable and more cyclical rhythms might find themselves better served with
an able in-house resource.
As companies build out their technology infrastructure across multiple
applications, job descriptions evolve accordingly. At some point, however, the
diversity of required skills exceeds what one person can bring to the table. If your
company's tech-stack is growing faster than your brain trust, then an outsourced
consultant can fill in the knowledge gaps.
Although consultants generally cost more by the hour, they can be employed on
an as needed basis, thereby costing less in the overall picture. Fortunately, the
choice between the development of in-house talent and outsourcing assistance is
not mutually exclusive. An alliance with a marketing automation agency can
supplement your company's resources by contributing a depth of expertise
beyond the average marketing team. So, although it's always good to have
qualified personnel in-house, it's equally valuable to maintain a relationship with
a trusted marketing automation agency.
Ready to get started?
Contact our experts today to discover how Marketing Automation Canada can help you get the most out of your MA tool.